The Death Penalty has been a part of American culture since the birth of the country itself. However, there have been recent debates on whether this penalty remain apart of the criminal justice system, which it obviously shouldn't. When considering sentencing an inmate to death via lethal injection, judges should consider multiple factors towards making their permanent decision. These main factors are contradicting personal values, mistaken or incorrect evidence, the easy way out provided to the alleged criminal, and an ideal solution that could prevent that relief provided to aforementioned criminals.
From the beginning, Americans have been taught that killing is wrong. This means that the reason murderers need to be killed is to prove the point that killing is wrong. The main point of justice is to teach a lesson. If teaching a lesson means contradicting your values and committing the crime that you are prosecuting against, the Judicial Branch is one huge hypocrite.
Secondly, according to Death Sentences Drop to a Historic Low in 2011, Troy Davis was executed despite multiple protests about his guilt or lack thereof. This poses such an excellent point. For example, in the book, A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. Gaines, the plot explains that Jefferson was executed in the electric chair even though there was not a enough evidence to prove his rightful guilt. One should ask themselves: if there have been perhaps hundreds wrongful executions, how are jurors to decide if the person should be put to death; or better yet, what man or woman could look at someone in the eyes and read their death sentence, then, five years later, find out that the same person was actually innocent?
In most cases, the inmate is guilty. To "trigger-happy" jurors and judges, this may be a rallying cry to argue their point, but the guilt of a victim doesn't automatically mean that the punishment should mimic the crime. Not only does a death sentence not prove the criminal justice's point that killing is wrong to the criminal, it also allows the inmate to take a breath of relief. Oh, alright, I won't have to live with the guilt or deal with the punishment for the rest of my life, because I won't have a life. Is this something that a punishment should inflict? A sense of hope?
So, there is a better solution to murder than a short stay on Death Row. Instead, the inmate should spend his or her time in solitary confinement in it's best form. Yes, it may be argued that modern prisons have many freedoms, but that is not what this blog is suggesting. Let it be that dark halls be erected in the middle of practical no where; this is where murderers and rapists should stay, in dark cellars, together, only being allowed in the light to eat. It is a far better punishment than simple injection and all of the worries gone with the liquid inside.